彩神彩票手机版APP - 彩神彩票手机版

来源：彩神彩票官方2022-03-08 17:48

彩神彩票手机版APP

新春走基层丨人头攒动的热乎劲又回来了——西北县城市场一线观察******

　　新华社兰州1月10日电题:人头攒动的热乎劲又回来了——西北县城消费市场一线观察

　　新华社记者

　　春节临近，位于甘肃省临夏回族自治州临夏市枹罕镇的高新花卉特色产业示范园区里暖如三春，园区内的临夏百益亿农国际鲜花港内，3个6万多平方米全自动智能温室里不同品种的玫瑰花争着盛开。采摘、保鲜、剪切、包装各环节上的几百名女工们忙个不停。

　　地处西北的甘肃省临夏州因光照充足，成为鲜花的优质产地。疫情防控政策优化调整后，各地经济迅速恢复，加上春节临近，对鲜花的需求大增，这个鲜花产业园每天出货20万枝，通过四通八达的物流销往全国各大城市。

　　在百益亿农国际鲜花港玫瑰工厂内，工人正在采摘玫瑰。（新华社记者周梦蝶摄）

　　临近春节，记者在临夏州、陇南市多县城发现，各地复工复产，消费活力迅速恢复。

　　临夏州百盛商贸有限公司在当地有17家超市，最大的一家营业面积超过一万平方米，位于临夏市中心天元广场。随着人流进入超市，伴着喜庆的新年歌声，随处可见的促销条幅挂满超市的各个货柜，促销手段多种多样，“买200送200”“会员享受双倍积分”“超值低价”……过年的气氛扑面而来。

　　市民在临夏市百盛超市天元广场店购物。（新华社记者马莎摄）

　　“从2022年的12月18日开始，客流量明显回升。”临夏州百盛商贸有限公司副总经理王莉萍说。

　　天刚擦黑，临夏市的人文景区“八坊十三巷”被彩灯、霓虹灯装扮成了梦幻之境。景区内摩肩接踵，狭窄处需侧身让行，嬉闹声、谈笑声、朋友相遇的寒暄声、叫卖声汇成一片。

　　该景区由临夏枫临文化旅游投资有限公司负责运营，董事高若楠说，景区内200家店铺有177家已经恢复营业，从元旦假期开始，景区开辟了多个夜游区域吸引游客。

　　“景区内人头攒动的热乎劲又回来了。”高若楠说。

　　这是近日临夏市“八坊十三巷”人文景区夜景。（临夏市融媒体中心供图）

　　记者在多个西北县城看到，一些档次较高的饭店和农家乐聚集地在饭点车来人往，名气较大的店甚至需要预订或排队，大小酒店也都恢复了七成入住率。

　　晚上7时左右，陇南市武都区状元楼饭店车位已满，店里一共20桌，有16桌已坐上了客人。饭店负责人田晓燕说，饭店日营业额已由元旦期间的两三千元恢复到了目前的1万元左右，年夜饭也已经订出了18桌。

　　下午3时许，尽管不是饭点，但在陇南市武都区丰正面道连锁店仍可以看到上座率在50%以上。店员正在给几位顾客热情地介绍着菜单上的美食小吃。这里的菜品主要为面食，后厨内锅气蒸腾，五六位师傅正忙前忙后。饭店总负责人李豪一边和熟客打招呼一边介绍说，目前店内已经恢复了往日的热闹景象，赶上饭点的时候甚至需要排队等待。

　　临夏市速8酒店大什字店不断有顾客进进出出，店长常永吉说，80间客房已有近50间入住，这一数字在元旦期间更高。

　　“复苏的情况好于预期。”常永吉介绍，这段时间，外地来住宿的旅客明显增多，这也是依托周边旅游业、餐饮业等逐步恢复所带来的效果。

　　“目前的经营情况可达到2019年的70%以上。”陇南市金都大酒店的负责人乔玲介绍，一些时段还需排队订房，酒店正摩拳擦掌准备迎接即将到来的春节。

　　临夏州商务局市场运行和消费促进科副科长陕明敏表示，目前正抓住春节消费旺季，开展让利打折刺激居民消费，促进餐饮住宿行业的复商复市。（记者姜伟超、周梦蝶、胡伟杰、马莎、崔嘉琪）

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.